|
|
|
The Education Board>
Innovative boarding schools
CeeBee
1590 post s
21-Mar-2008
12:32 PM
|
The Chicago Public Schools (CPS) has proposed a bold and ambitious proposal--to create tuition-free boarding schools for homeless and troubled students. CPS head, Arne Duncan, has stated, "There are certain children where home isn't working, for whatever reason." Troubled students would include those who have a chaotic homelife or who are threatened by street gangs. The boarding schools could be of several types: a complex combining a school and a dorm, schooling at one location and housing at another, and educating and housing students whose behavior already has them involved with the juvenile justice system. Since CPS students often face myriad situations, some version of all three models might be needed. CPS believes it has become the schools' obligation to step in and offer not only necessities but also incentives to help students learn. Many parents cannot or will not provide the tools or attitude children need to succeed in school. Should the schools step in where parents cannot or will not? Should the larger issues of unemployment, lack of affordable housing, and drug addiction that prevent parents from helping kids succeed be addressed first?
Last Edited on 21-Mar-2008 12:34 PM
|
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2612 post s
21-Mar-2008
9:23 PM
|
I would need to see more details before declaring this to be an unqualified good idea, but it might be a good step. Something needs to be done to address the plight of "at risk" young people, especially in urban areas. In many cases, parents cannot or will not do so by themselves. Yes, we must do more to directly address "unemployment, lack of affordable housing, and drug addiction," but these are huge and often intractable problems, and all we've been able to do in decades of confronting them has been to come up with band-aids. In many cases, we've taken one step forward and two steps back. Every time the economy worsens (as it is doing now), unemployment goes up, affecting the parents of these at-risk kids the most. We construct "affordable housing," but in a short time these developments become nests of criminal activity. The so-called "war on drugs" is an abysmal failure that has done little but overload the prisons with drug offenders (major and minor). Perhaps a plan such as this will provide an ounce of prevention. It's obvious that we're far short of a "cure." Still, as I said, I would need to know a lot more. I'm never optimistic about any program advanced by the bureaucracy (even a well-intentioned bureaucracy) and especially one that is in the hands of bureaucrats and educrats. No matter how good it looks on paper and in theory, it can be a waste of tax dollars if it is not implemented wisely. ---------- Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)
|
CeeBee
1599 post s
28-Mar-2008
7:48 PM
|
A sort of rebuttal in yesterday's paper wondered why CPS doesn't first try those ideas that have been mentioned but never tried and have a good chance of working without creating such financial and personal upheaval. One of the solutions was making the school day longer. Another was having school all year 'round.
|
Pogo
282 post s
3-Apr-2008
10:45 AM
|
I remember hearing both of those solutions suggested in the 1950s, about the same time I first heard of social promotion. Most of the problems are, I think, due to parents not knowing how to be parents. And the sociology of today: I've heard from teachers whose high school and junior high school students spend all their time on trying to figure out how to be declared handicapped so that Social Security will support them for the rest of their lives.
|
CeeBee
1645 post s
5-Apr-2008
8:40 PM
|
I'm sure those high school and junior high school students who "spend all their time on trying to figure out how to be declared handicapped so that Social Security will support them for the rest of their lives" will finally figure out that getting SSI is easier said than done. My adult counseling clients who were on SSI because of real disabilities received letters after three years and were told they would have to report for job training or prove that they were job hunting. One ended up cleaning houses for working couples; another got a job in a hospital office. A friend who is permanently disabled works part-time because SSI doesn't cover all his living expenses. SSI periodically checks up on him regarding his disability and demands proof from his healthcare workers. SSI isn't a handout to anyone who wants it.
|
|
|