Literature Board>
List of Literature books
Mr.CEO

4 post s
23-Sep-2007
2:42 PM
I would appreciated if I can get a list of good literature books. Thank you for suggestions and I look forward to reading them. You've been a great help.
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2351 post s
23-Sep-2007
10:43 PM
Mr. CEO: Please give some specifics about what you would like to have. I'm sure that this board's participants will be happy to oblige, perhaps by directing you to websites that give lists.

For example, are you looking for a list of books that are considered classics of Western literature? Most such lists tend to be quite long, so you may want to narrow the field. Some indication of what your interests are or the purpose to which you want to put this list would be helpful.

There's a remote possibility that by "literature books" you mean books about literature (criticism, the history of literature, and the like). That would be a whole different ballpark.

If you are embarking on a reading program, it is wise to remember the words of Francis Bacon: "Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested." Understand, too, that no two people will agree completely about which are which.
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)

CeeBee

1231 post s
24-Sep-2007
10:21 AM
Mr.CEO had posted on another board that he would like to become a better writer and speaker of English. I suggested he read the material on this site, feel free to post questions as well as offer opinions, read good literature, and even post short essays/stories that he wants us to read and make suggestions about style and grammar.

I've been trying to come up with a list for him. I've consulted with a couple of prolific readers and suggest American poets Edgar Lee Masters, Robert Frost, Vachel Lindsay, and Carl Sandburg for starters. Shorter novels by John Steinbeck, such as The Red Pony and Cannery Row, Washington Irving's "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" from his Sketch Book, stories by Brett Harte and Jack London, and perhaps J. D. Salinger's Nine Stories would be less daunting examples of American literature.

Somerset Maugham, Roald Dahl, P.G. Wodehouse, and even certain of the Newbery winners (children's fiction) are possibilities, especially if Mr.CEO is a non-native English speaker (which I'm guessing he is).

Pogo

12 post s
24-Sep-2007
2:41 PM
What makes these literature? Does anyone really read them, other than literature teachers and the pupils and students ordered to? I was fed The Red Pony and The Pearl -- and I immediately swore off all Steinbeck forevermore! The other authors you name did not write the English of today; they wrote the English of their today. Copying the language of older writers gives a stilted feel.

If they must be older writers -- Twain? Kipling?

If they must be good writers of now -- Lois McMaster Bujold? Poul Anderson? Sharyn McCrumb? And Mr. CEO can amuse himself by looking for the typos to be found in almost any current print of almost anything.

Pogo

Pogo

13 post s
24-Sep-2007
2:54 PM
By "good writer," I mean someone who can tell a good story, who has a good vocabulary and can write compound and complex sentences as well as simple ones.

Barbara Cartland is not a good writer.

Mr.CEO, are you looking for practice in current American English? If so, what genre do you like to read? Or are you studying American sociology? Current or historical?

Pogo

Brenda

265 post s
29-Sep-2007
8:23 PM
I'm a literature teacher, but I admit that I don't have the students read some of the literature that is considered classic. If I can't appreciate it, there's not much of a chance that most 16-year-olds will "get" it.

I agree with CeeBee's choices. They are interesting stories and not so obscure that they are boring. Her suggestion of Newberry Awards winners is good too. They may be classified as juvenile literature, but I find most of them enjoyable reads for any age.

Last Edited on 29-Sep-2007 8:24 PM

TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2366 post s
1-Oct-2007
3:55 PM
Pogo's response illustrates one of the problems in compiling a list of books. Much depends on personal taste. I happened to pick up The Red Pony when I was a boy, not because it was required reading but because it was lying around our house. I liked it enough that I read quite a bit of Steinbeck in the next few years. It may not have been great or classical reading, but I truly enjoyed Steinbeck.

Brenda's comment reminds me of one of my experiences (in my early years of teaching) that illustrates how hard it is to teach a book one doesn't appreciate. When I was teaching a lit course, a respected colleague talked me into teaching Jane Austen's Emma. I had not read it before and didn't even care very much for Jane Austen's more famous books. However, I went along. I wound up inadvertently panning the book in class, despite trying not to do so. Finally, one young lady, who had hardly ever before spoken up in class, rose out of her seat and proclaimed, "How can you say that? This is the best book I've ever read."

It all came out OK, however. I spoke with the student, apologized for criticizing the book (after all, I had assigned the book), and explained that the enjoyment of a book is an individual matter, heavily influenced by one's taste. I certainly didn't want to douse the spark that could ignite an interest in reading.

Though Emma isn't usually among them, there are some works on every list of so-called classics that don't appeal to me or interest me. I concede that they must be there for some reason, but it's rather obvious to me that nobody (not even a committee of literary scholars) can compile a list in which everything is acceptable to everybody. A list can be a starting point; after that, each of us should be guided by his or her own developing tastes. What's important is that we do begin – and give our tastes and interests a chance to develop.
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)