|
|
|
Literature Board>
Love of literature
SapphireMoon
41 post s
1-Jul-2007
3:56 PM
|
You who truly love literature and love reading (not necessarily the same thing), what do you think accounts for that? Is it because of or in spite of the way reading was taught to you in school, or was your schooling irrelevant to it? What experiences do you think shaped your love of reading, and how are they different from the experiences of those who hate it? If you were trying to instill or encourage a love of reading and literature in a young person or young people, how would you do it? I'm not looking for parental advice here. My children are both good readers, and my older son's academic career shows an unusual proficiency in reading. I'm asking because I'm interested in the factors that have made avid readers of some and not others and what they have in common, and because I'm wondering what things can be done past early childhood to induce a love of literature in people. It's all very well to say "read to your child," but can a teenager or young adult or even an older adult be turned on to reading when the age of "The Poky Little Puppy" and "Goodnight, Moon" is past? The Harry Potter phenomenon is a partial answer to this question, but what I'm really after here is a glimpse of the personal backgrounds that we think have made us love reading and literature.
|
Kathleen
475 post s
3-Jul-2007
6:11 AM
|
You know, I really don't know. I liked reading from almost the first moment I tried it and never looked back. Presumably part of the reason why I liked it was because I was pretty good at it -- it is a lot easier to like something you're good at -- but not every early-grade good reader becomes a steady book reader, not every steady book reader becomes a lover of books, and as you noted, Sapphire, not every lover of books becomes a lover of literature. But as for why I made that transition...hmmm... There is one event that I can point to that if it didn't actually cause me to become a book lover certainly encouraged my book-loving proclivities, and that was when I contracted mononucleosis in the 3rd grade. Lots of jokes are made about mono, but all I can say is that it wasn't a joke for me since I was for several weeks a pretty sick little kid, running a fever that varied from slightly elevated to downright uncomfortable. For that matter, it wasn't a joke for my parents, who had to nurse me for the nine weeks that I was out of school. Even after I returned to school, I was on limited activity for several weeks. It was when I was stuck in the house all that time that I became not just a reader of books but a devourer of books. Would it have happened without mononucleosis? Maybe -- who can say? But it was then, when I was stuck in the house with little else to do and when I discovered for myself that television just wasn't all it was cracked up to be, that I discovered that a good book can be the best friend anybody ever had. As for making the transition from enjoying books to enjoying literature...well, I like some literature. Not all. So is it literature that I like or just some books that happen to be literature? I suspect it's the latter. Kathleen
Last Edited on 3-Jul-2007 8:57 AM
|
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2213 post s
3-Jul-2007
11:03 AM
|
Without intending to be funny, I might say that I could write a book about how I developed a love of literature. Here’s the condensed version. First some background: My mother and dad came of age during the Great Depression, so Mother never finished high school, and Dad had only a business school education. My two older siblings went all the way through high school at British preparatory schools in South Africa because Dad’s job caused us to live there for 17 years. (I attended the same school as my brother did until I was 12, when we returned to the States.) Neither of my siblings went to college, but both were readers, as was I. Books were mainstays in our house, and there were many of them. Dad subscribed to the Book-of-the-Month Club, and many of its selections from those days were destined to become literary classics. My older brother and sister were within two years of each other in age, so they developed very active social lives with each other’s friends. There was a large gap in age between me and them, so I was more of a loner. I was read to and learned to read by myself very early – even skipped the equivalent of second grade because of my reading level at the time. Books became my companions. I had plenty to choose from in the house, and I was never discouraged from trying a book, even if it might be deemed "too advanced" or "too adult." More importantly, I developed very early (I’d say around the age of nine) a fascination with the power of the written word. I was not satisfied with just passively absorbing books; I wanted to write. When I read a book, I was already – at some unconscious level – studying how writers used words to produce the desired effects. I was like the budding musician marveling at the performance of a virtuoso. And, as I began to write, I also began to appreciate how difficult it was to do it well. Truly understanding how hard it is to write well inevitably increases one’s appreciation of good writing. Given this background, it was inevitable that I would major in English in college. My appreciation of literature expanded as I came to understand how masters of the language captured ideas and experiences – clearly, intensely, movingly. In my childhood, I could be moved to tears by a story because it was sad; as an adult, I could be moved to tears by something because it was simply “so well written,” just as music can sometimes move me in ways that I cannot fully explain. My older siblings remained “readers” all their lives and perhaps they developed a love of literature. However, they never experienced my urge to write, at least not to the degree that I did, so probably their love of literature was less intense. Nothing enhances one’s appreciation of literature more than having tried to write a good book – and failed. Understand – I’m not saying that this is the only pathway to a love of literature. It is just, as the question asks, the pathway that I took. ---------- Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)
|
CeeBee
1088 post s
4-Jul-2007
11:26 PM
|
My mother claims I was born holding a book. There was a definite advantage to being the firstborn of a stay-at-home mom and a minister father. I was amused with all sorts of true and made-up stories and was read to from early on. Professional and popular titles, cookbooks, a thick medical book, two sets of encyclopedias, and children's as well as adult classics filled bookshelves throughout the house. (It's no wonder the libraries I've worked in felt like home. I grew up in one!) One of my earliest memories is of sitting on the couch, snuggled next to my mom who was pointing out the pictures to me in a rebus version of "The Little Red Hen." My happiness knew no bounds when we went grocery shopping and I was allowed to choose a new Golden Book from the tall black spinner rack chock-full of them. I memorized each one. A bit worse for wear, they now sit in a box in my mother's attic after being shared with my siblings and their children. My mother also claims I decoded the printed page when I was around two. Sometimes she read to me; other times I read to her. Most of the time we shared the reading. She believed a reader should be able to write well, so I helped her write grocery lists, and she made sure I carefully printed thank-you notes when I received gifts. On one trip to the grocery store, instead of choosing a Golden Book, I picked out a stop-light-red wire-bound notebook into which I printed lists of rhyming words. No wonder I was redirected to another activity when I occasionally sat on the tall kitchen step stool and recited, for instance, my "buck" and "bit" lists to her while she did supper preparation. (I'm really fast at peeling potatoes now after all the experience I got!) The first Bobbsey Twins book came into my life when I was around eight. I can't recall any of the details, but I remember reveling in the adventures of Flossie and Freddie (the younger twins) and Nan and Bert (the older twins). For some reason, when I went off to college, my mother gave away my treasured set of slowly-acquired titles, usually given to me at birthdays and Christmas. I would kill to have that set today. Not long ago, I was crushed to learn that the Bobbsey Twins author, Laura Lee Hope, whom I had greatly admired and whose writing talents I envied, was nothing more than a pseudonym of the Stratemeyer Syndicate (Google that for some interesting reading!). Alert for crossword puzzlers: Occasionally in crosswords is the clue, "a Bobbsey twin" (three letters). Now you know. Over the next few years, I gravitated to other series (also written by the Stratemeyer Syndicate!) such as Nancy Drew. Oh, how I wanted to grow up to be like Nancy, a sassy and bold titian-haired amateur detective who, flashlight in hand, drove her blue roadster at high speeds on gravel roads as she snooped and trespassed and detected! My younger brother had been given several Hardy Boys titles in hopes that he would sit down and read instead of finding ways to misbehave. They looked interesting, so I confiscated them from his bedroom bookshelf. He never missed them. About this same time, I was given Johanna Spyri's Heidi (crossword alert: "author of Heidi," five letters). I learned that Heidi's grandfather and his friendly, playful goats lived in the Swiss canton of Uri (crossword alert: "Swiss canton," three letters), that goat milk is very delicious and nutritious (I begged my parents to buy goat milk fudge sold at roadside stands along the way to occasional picnics at Niagara Falls, but they never gave in), and hoped I would never have to eat the hard black bread that was in the daily diet of the rural Swiss farmers and herders. My prepubescent self wept tears of joy when Heidi overcame the influences of several selfish and hypocritical minor characters, taught the goatherd Peter how to read and write, and then, in the two sequels, married him and had his blond, rosy-cheeked babies. Of course, my pigtails never looked quite as good as Heidi's, but I'm thinking of buying a few goats that can live happily in my large, fenced-in back yard and provide me with milk for fudge for my retirement home-business. When I was ten, I was given my own 20-volume set of Grolier's The Book of Knowledge, copyright 1952. Open a volume today and I can still smell that same delicious fragrance of glossy paper, stitching, and waiting treasures. Those volumes were read from cover to cover (although I must admit I skipped over some of the science sections). My two adult sons later used the set for school reports. The set now sits happily in a bookshelf in my living room. Maybe after I finish typing this, I will pull out a volume to inhale a bit of nostalgia. I won't mention high school and college reading requirements and my discovering George Eliot and Shakespeare and poetry. Those experiences will pop up somewhere in future posts, I'm sure. Years later, when I had my first baby, I flew home to show off the first grandchild and to collect my childhood books such as Old Man Rabbit's Dinner Party, the 1950-something 1st edition of Better Homes and Gardens Story Book (which contains classics from Beatrix Potter's Peter Rabbit to Joel Chandler Harris' stories about Uncle Remus to excerpts from Rudyard Kipling's Elephant's Child and, scattered throughout, poetry by the likes of Wordsworth and Poe, rebuses [rebi?], and stories that taught respect for animals and people as well as stories that pushed the imagination). Reading the excerpts whetted my appetite for the originals. I still have these childhood books shelved in my bedside bookcase. Just the sight of them comforts me after a stressful day. So, to wind this up (yes, Bradd, I really am going to), I have always been a reader. When I was just a little girl, my Chicago grandmother introduced me to a new reading universe during our family's annual two-week vacation to visit her and my grandfather. On steamy July afternoons, she and I would lie on the white chenille bedspread that covered the big bed in her cool back bedroom and read Superman, Wonder Woman, Little Lotta/Richie Rich, and Uncle Scrooge comics. Because of that, stacks of comics always accompanied me during a car trip, whether it was seven miles to the grocery store or 1800 miles to my Idaho grandparents' home. Nowadays, I'm thrilled to be surrounded by books at work at the library and at home, nearly every hour of my life.
Last Edited on 8-Jul-2007 12:56 PM
|
Rachel P
1 post
9-Jul-2007
8:35 PM
|
Hi, I'm new here, but I wanted to get in on this post. I have always had a love of books. I can remember as a small child, my mother always read to me. That was a central focus of my day and a major joy for me. I had more books than I had other toys. I remember wanting to read so badly. My brother was older than I was by five years. I begged him to teach me to read before I started school. He tried, bless his heart, he tried, but he didn't' know how to teach me. I began Kindergarten and was so happy because I was going to finally learn to read. I came home from school quite angry because the teacher did not teach me to read that first day of school. Eventually I did learn to read. It was easy for me. Books were my friends. The librarian and I were on a first name basis with each other. By the time I was in 4th grade I was reading on a High School senior level. They couldn't keep me in books at my elementary school. Thankfully I had a wonderful teacher that went to the public library and borrowed books for me that were more on my reading level. I read Pride and Prejudice and Gone with the Wind for the first time in 4th or 5th grade. Math, well that was a different story. Numbers made no sense to me what-so-ever. I guess reading has been something that I have always loved. It was easy for me and it took me to a different world than what I was living in. It took me away from a very ill parent and all the things in life that come with that. I still find peace and comfort in books.
|
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2230 post s
9-Jul-2007
9:48 PM
|
I just want to welcome you here and thank you for commenting. Your experience suggests what I've always suspected – a love of literature is implanted early in life. I suppose some to come to it later, but almost all the people I know who have it tell about someone or something early in life that ignited the spark. ---------- Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)
|
Rachel P
2 post s
10-Jul-2007
12:00 PM
|
Thank you for the welcome. I agree with you, that the love of literature is implanted early in life for most. My husband, who is also a reader, has memories very similar to mine. I read your profile and agree with you completely that people are becoming more and more illiterate. I am a teacher as well. My chosen field is Deaf Education. The children I teach are 3, 4 and 5 years of age. The problem that I encounter the most with these children is lack of language all together. When they enter my classroom at three yeas of age we have to start with the very basics of language and eventually work into being able to put words together with manual communication, oral language or both. Instilling in these children a love of literature and the printed word is extremely difficult. For most people with a hearing impairment, reading is a very difficult task. However, I want my students to love books and all that books have to offer. We do daily activities with books. We read them, we study them, we act out the stories, we study the characters, we rewrite pieces of the stories. I still feel like I have hit a roadblock with these children because by 2nd or 3rd grade, when children begin reading to learn instead of learning to read, they abandon books. With cochlear implants becoming increasingly popular, I have hope that this trend will decline. The students are able to hear more sounds and language levels are increasing. I'm holding out hope that these children will still learn to love books. Thank you for letting me go off on a slight tangent. ---------- Rachel Pettit
|
SapphireMoon
48 post s
10-Jul-2007
11:43 PM
|
Welcome, Rachel! I'm pretty new here myself, and I'm delighted that my question attracted your interest enough to make you want to post your first message. I'm curious about your profession, too, and I have a question about it, based on what you wrote. Do you have any idea whether the task you struggle with--instilling language into children who are essentially without it and who are past the usual age of language acquisition--is equally difficult in any language or if there are linguistic traits that make some languages more difficult than others to acquire in this way?
|
Rachel P
3 post s
11-Jul-2007
8:48 PM
|
If you are asking specifically about hearing imparied students, then any language is difficult to acquire. I will try not to rant too much about a very age old argument on this subject. People who are Deaf (physiologically and culturally) speak American Sign Language (ASL). ASL has its own pragmatics, syntax, and supra segmentals. It is a natural language and is a recognized language. Here is where the argument comes. Most, I am not saying all, but a majority, of hearing impaired adults who are natural ASL signers graduate high school with the average reading level of 3rd grade. Therefore, public schools (these are considered Regional Day School Programs for the Deaf RDSPD) have adopted the Signing Exact English system (SEE). SEE is not a language. It is a system only. They have adopted this system in hopes of boosting literacy levels for this population. Because SEE is not a language it does not have enough of the broad concepts to develop higer language levels. So instead of having higher language levels these children are actually getting pieces of two languages at the same time. They need the broad language base of ASL first to develop deeper language concepts before adding the difficult task of learning English. English is a very difficult language to learn. Think about how much we rely on our hearing to develop our language. For example, we learn multiple meaning words by hearing how they are used. These children can not do that. So, I guess to answer your question directly. Yes, any language is difficult for them to learn. ASL is much easier and they can develop higher conceptual language levels, but will possibly have lower reading and academic levels. But, English is by far more difficult for them to learn. ---------- Rachel Pettit
|
Brenda
241 post s
11-Jul-2007
10:30 PM
|
My childhood experience was a little different from the others who have posted here: I don't remember my parents reading to me. My mother does not like to read and, in fact, considers it a waste of time for an adult. My father used to read lots of nonfiction, but I don't think he ever read novels. When I was very young, a salesman talked them into buying a set of books for children. I got hooked on them. I remember there was one book of poetry and a book of fairy tales. We traveled very little, so I loved strange places and adventures. I don't think I realized it then, but I also loved the sound and the rhythm of the words. I spent hours in my upstairs bedroom (where no one could hear me) reading aloud. Even now, I tell my students to read their essays aloud and listen for the changes they should make. And--my parents and my entire family had a very strong work ethic. My parents were thrilled that I was a good student. Reading was almost work for a student, so it got me out of the real work. Just this last weekend, my my aunt told me that she remembered me as always having a book in front of me when I was a kid. I don't think she meant it as a compliment.
|
Bradd
344 post s
12-Jul-2007
9:44 PM
|
Like Brenda, my childhood experience was a little different from what has been posted here by others. I have little recollection of being read to (although I'm sure I was as all children are) or any emphasis being placed on reading. Both parents were graduates of superior colleges, in the case of my mother unusual for a woman in those days, so for me a love of reading may be simply genetic. I DO recall being curious about everything and my parents frequently giving me presents of books or magazines which I always loved. I have no memory of my father reading anything but the newspaper and my mother reading only Agatha Christie and that sort of book. This surprises me as I look back now and try to imagine what their intellectual life would have been as they grew up and before I was born. My one sibling, an older girl and also a well-educated college type, seemed to have restricted her reading to the occasional crime novel and the NY Times Sunday Magazine where she was most interested in the fashion ads. Reading, as a child, took a distant second place to sports which, if I could be considered to have been obsessive about anything, it was the daily routine of playing at athletics. (We would shovel the snow off the basketball courts on Christmas Day - in our suits). I think smart kids read, period. It's something they almost have no choice about. A good environment certainly helps, but, like art, reading will out. [EDIT] I just re-read the question. Reading vs. literature. Sorry. One way to define literature is that it is about the great themes. Surely, reading helps to examine these. But does reading CAUSE the interest, or is reading the method to get at the crux of the matter. Clearly, reading is a means to the end. Anyone, reader or non-reader, can experience love, hate, trials and tribulations, war; and yet have not read a single word. Reading, then, becomes a sharing of common experiences, and that may be its prime glory. When I read a classic piece of literature by a long-dead author, I feel like I am having a conversation with the author. Truly a marvelous thing.
Last Edited on 12-Jul-2007 10:10 PM
|
SapphireMoon
88 post s
9-Aug-2007
8:19 PM
|
I've really enjoyed all the contributions to this thread. Thank you very much! CeeBee, a question: >the 1950-something 1st edition of Better Homes and Gardens Story Book (which contains classics from Beatrix Potter's Peter Rabbit to Joel Chandler Harris' stories about Uncle Remus to excerpts from Rudyard Kipling's Elephant's Child and, scattered throughout, poetry by the likes of Wordsworth and Poe, rebuses [rebi?], and stories that taught respect for animals and people as well as stories that pushed the imagination). Reading the excerpts whetted my appetite for the originals. Was that a pair of books, about 10" x 12", one with a coral-orange cover and the other with a slightly greenish yellow cover, in one of which there was a story about a little girl names Sophie whose dolls all came to life one day?
|
OldGuy
11 post s
23-Aug-2007
12:43 PM
|
SapphireMoon, I think a part of your answer lies in your question. You want to know, or learn. And you find learning and knowing so rewarding you wish to see others have the same benefit. Bradd also mentions having been curious. This is because you are both aware, that is, very conscious. Being aware means having a curious, questioning, observing, and analytical mind. (By the way, CeeBee, nostalgia is awareness.) Unfortunately, too many people are simply not that way. It is, I believe, genetic and thus not something you can otherwise provide to someone else. However, where that sort of mind exists, the provision of means and environment for its realization and development is extremely important, beginning early as possible. Reading is not the only means of learning, but one of the most available and far reaching. Some of us, like CeeBee and Rachel P and I, are lucky to have had parents read to us when we were small, as well as teach by example in being readers themselves. What is inherited is thus nurtured. I come from an economically depressed background (poor as ‘possums is what we were), but my mother, and even more so her mother, were readers. My father and an uncle had eighth-grade, one-room school educations, but they were readers. While their overall situations dictated they be no more than laborers all their lives, they could, in the areas of spelling, grammar, and general knowledge, put to shame most of the present-day high school and college graduates I have known. I remember my uncle's formula for keeping in shape that way: "I read every book in the school bookcase. Now I read everything that gets in front of me—-papers, books, signs, cereal boxes, whatever." Both their father and their grandmother, with even less schooling, kept diaries. In those are many indications that, in spite of a very difficult existence, they liked reading. Books were not very easy to come by, but they managed to obtain them (as did Abe Lincoln). Many others in their world did not have such interest. Again, it seems hereditary. I was fortunate in having a little time and a public library between school and the point where I boarded the bus for the long ride home each day, so I read a lot on the bus. I guess my schoolteachers were capable, but many classmates under those same teachers were never moved in 12 years toward things literary or artistic, which indicates we were simply different. Being alone develops the mind that is aware. Kathleen was stuck in the house during a long period of sickness. The Mudge says circumstances made him somewhat of a loner. "Carbine" Williams invented iwith his mind alone the semiautomatic weapon that became the U.S. Carbine, Cal. 30, M1 during long periods of solitary confinement. When I was not in school, I had hundreds of acres of woodland and field around me, the nearest boy my age living a mile away and no girls at all. No television. Nothing mechanical. Without distractions, I learned early on to see and hear and comprehend wondrous things of this Earth that most people never will, even if presented with the opportunity. My objective learning by observation and discovery led to more subjective learning by reading. Reading led to more observations and questions. It was a dynamic, self-sustaining process. It led to things such as finding, because of experience in observation, a particular flint projectile point and knowing, because of reading, that I was the first one to see and hold it since its Paleo owner lost it 10,000 years ago. I can imagine no entertainment that can compare with that. I have seriously considered offering to help teach high school students of the right attitude how to observe and learn in my own woodland. The rules would be “no cell phones, no other electronics, no pets, not even gerbil bottles. Customary play clothes may be worn in preference to proper wear, however. Wading through nettles and brambles and chiggers that way is effective education.” What I am saying here, with tongue in cheek, is that the willing and able young person must be taught how to remove himself from the noise and distraction and herd programming, giving his mind a chance to work and experience independently and actively, to become aware. By my own experience, I believe that will lead to a more open and inquiring mentality that will want to read, and a person who is an individual. I have gone on quite long enough. You like reading? An excellent elaboration on what I have tried to express, and much more, can be found in "Legacy," by Eric Sloane (also a self-proclaimed curmudgeon, Mudge). Funk & Wagnalls-Thomas Y. Crowell, 1979, ISBN 0-308-10351-3.
Last Edited on 24-Aug-2007 2:09 PM
|
Brenda
252 post s
23-Aug-2007
6:17 PM
|
To Old Guy from and old gal, Would you mind if I copy your last thread for my sister-in-law? She and her husband own forty acres that cannot be reached by car. They have to park their car and walk about 30 minutes to get to it. A couple of times a month they spend all day tramping around it. They like to find arrowheads and snake skins, but most of the time they just find live snakes. I have been telling them for years that they are nuts, so I'm sure they'll feel much better when they read your thread--although I do somehow have the impression that they don't much care what I think.
|
OldGuy
12 post s
24-Aug-2007
6:53 AM
|
They're not nuts, Brenda, they're AWARE, and they're enjoying it. I'll bet they read, too. I'd like to meet them. Too bad they have to travel to get to their piece of real world. I guess I'm fortunate to have my big shagbarks and wildflowers right up to the porch. When people hear I have 20 acres they say, "You must have a time mowing all that lawn!" And I reply, "Lawn? What lawn?" Of course you can copy to them. Imprimatur.
Last Edited on 24-Aug-2007 2:40 PM
|
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2295 post s
24-Aug-2007
9:01 AM
|
Old Guy: I am tremendously impressed by your entry, particularly the part about the value of solitude ("Being alone develops the mind that is aware"). Alas, in our society of "connectedness," I believe that this concept is disappearing. While you have compelling evidence that such a viewpoint is hereditary, I would have to contend that environment is also a strong influence – but let's not get into a nature versus nurture debate. Anyway, your piece is too good to lose, and (as you probably know) I eventually remove posts from the boards as time passes. (I still archive them on my own computer for reference, but they are no longer publicly available.) With your permission, I would like to copy what you have written as a sort of guest article somewhere else on this site, where it won't get deleted – with a headnote explaining the source and the context. Please let me know. Although, it's not necessary, please feel free to refine or add to the existing post. (I may, in fact – again, with your permission – use it as the basis for a writing assignment for my class.) ---------- Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)
|
OldGuy
13 post s
24-Aug-2007
2:48 PM
|
And Mudge, I am tremendously honored that you would think this hilljack has something worthwhile to consider. Neither do I think there is good reason to debate nature vs. nurture, since both are so very important, with each affecting different people, in different ways and in different situations, to different extents. I have only added a few words to my posts, because I am really afraid of running off, since I have just finished a 400-page, 101-plate book, and haven't calmed down yet. That took a lot of research and reading and thinking over the last 25 years. That much research and reading and thinking tends to make one want to communicate. Your note has already given me the courage to reply to SapphireMoon's other thread about stories you can't forget. Certainly, you can do whatever you believe to be of some benefit with the post.
Last Edited on 24-Aug-2007 7:44 PM
|
Ali
3 post s
12-Sep-2008
8:09 AM
|
I know this isn't a recent post, but I wanted to add my two cents. For as long as I can remember, reading has been my choice to fill any free time (and time that should be spent doing other things!). I don't remember my parents reading to me, although I know my mom did when I was very young. My sister, who very nearly loathes books, and I grew up in the same house with the same influences so it would be difficult to pinpoint why our views differ so much where reading is concerned. As many have mentioned in earlier posts, I would say being a loner plays a large part in why I enjoy reading. I would read any book my mom would leave within my reach and luckily she encouraged this. Books trumped the TV in my mind and made great companions when I would wander through the woods near my house. Another factor that I think contributed to my love of reading is that I am a little OCD in that I read everything: billboards, shampoo bottles, model numbers on merchandise (and if the closed captioning is on, there's no way I can't read it!). I have also come to love literature. I think this has to do with a curiosity of others. Although I am still a loner, I am interested in how other people's minds work. I love to study literature. I wonder why classic literature survives through time and why this writer chose to write a story. The entertaining part, to me, is trying to figure out why the author would devote time and energy to one idea. I think many who do not particularly enjoy reading would find it agreeable if they could find a piece of literature that grabbed them. My sister, for instance, who never reads anything found that joy with the Harry Potter books. She devoured those books like triple chocolate fudge cake! But she hasn't read a book since. I could read anything and it would fill my need to read, but when I read literature, I learn things about people that I just can't quite figure out in everyday life.
|
Pogo
604 post s
23-Sep-2008
9:28 AM
|
My father read to me, Little Golden Books and the Sunday funnies. Just before my fifth birthday, my Christmas presents included two Bobbsey Twins books. Then I found more in bookcases around the house, and Nancy Drew, Cherry Ames, Vicki Barr, Connie Blair. Random issues of Jack & Jill. My very own subscription to Children's Digest. Mother never had any rules about what books I could read, and there were lots of books around the house. By the time I was ten, I had found some science fiction lying around. As well as a full set of Childcraft and the Book of Knowledge (nothing like the Book of Knowledge now). I didn't have a library card until I was in seventh grade; the library allowed me into the children's room only and had one three-foot section of "young adult." Mother allowed me to borrow no more than four books at a time, and took me to the library only every two weeks. But then, Mother was not a reader! Everyone else in the family read books, lots. When I was in third grade, I read a book or two that my older sister had borrowed from the high school library, and liked a couple enough that when I got to high school, I searched them out. I have loved to read so much for so long that one of Mother's punishments for me was to forbid any reading other than as necessary for schoolwork for three days.
|
|
|