General Message Board>
Frantic Lives
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2714 post s
14-May-2008
1:20 PM
Here's another Mudgelog entry for discussion – On the Fast Track to Where . . . and Why? (scroll down to May 14). Am I just an old coot, or does this make sense? (I would especially like to hear from younger folks about this one.)
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)

Last Edited on 20-May-2008 2:30 PM

OldGuy

62 post s
14-May-2008
9:40 PM
At the 1939 World Fair, there were so many wonderful new machines that it was predicted the country would soon have to go to a 32-hour work week. What I experienced was more like 50 or 60 plus work brought home, and my sons are worse off than that. Unfortunately, we are living on planet Earth, and this is how it naturally goes with nearly all species here. I watch the various wild birds at our window feeder, amused how most waste their time with greed and competition. The feeder is always full of sunflower seed and they can eat whatever they need, but they spend time fumbling around trying to see how many seeds they can get into one bill. Then they rush these to a stash in a nearby knothole or crevice and come back for more. Meanwhile another bird is watching each as he leaves his cache, and robs it, taking it to his own larder that is also being watched, and so on. These are all in a great hurry and they make many trips but aren’t seen to eat much. Only a few stay at the feeder, eat up, and leave for a long while to enjoy life a little. There are smart birds but mostly noticeably dumb birds. People are like that.
Only a fortunate minority of humans learn not to be any more competitive than necessary, and not to want more than what they need. It’s not easy. If we are not born with a sense of having to do everything we possibly can and get everything we can, there are parents, teachers, peers, superiors, government, and users to goad us all the way.
We have more and more technology and power that is more and more available, and the more we are able to do, the more we feel we must do or are forced to do, like spending time on this computer we didn’t always have.
Competition, wanting more, and being used. That’s our problem. Overpopulation, greater distances to cover, excess communication, excess government and taxes, excess dependence on us by so many others, less basic principles and discipline, etc., etc. It costs money, and that leads to more of the foregoing. We have a big, growing package of vicious and intertwined circles. H. D. Thoreau tried to teach us about being content, and W.E. Deming tried to teach us how to cooperate rather than compete so darn much. But who’s listened?
Depending on our own personal situations we may or may not be inextricably stuck with, we can get some control. In our own home, for example, we resigned our volunteer organizational positions after seeing how much of our own lives and money it cost and how no one else was sharing the effort. We stay out of the Interstate madness and enjoy state routes. There are no cell phones in this household, no cable, and very little commercial TV. We’ve learned too that arthritis finally relieves you of some of the hurry and endless work by putting you on the bench where you can just watch and rest.
rhubarb

177 post s
16-May-2008
2:33 PM
I don't know if my age, 49, qualifies me as the sort of younger person you're wanting to hear from, Mudge, but I'll take a chance anyway and launch into some anecdotage.

You're right on the money about all this frantic busyness going on everywhere. A couple of years ago I ran into a high school classmate getting ready to board the same post-Christmas flight in our small community, a 40-minute hop to the nearest major airport. She was carrying a chic designer clutch purse and a slim laptop case. Because the current stringent rules only allowed one item on board per passenger, a second carry-on to be gate-checked, she had to give up her precious laptop. I let her throw her hissy fit without offering the folded-up canvas tote (which would have held both items quite nicely) I had tucked into my purse, partly because it amused me and partly because it might have been rejected for not coordinating with her outfit. Apparently her high-end job as a telecom sales manager required her to slave away even for a flight lasting less than an hour.

I wasn't impressed. People who are that busy, in that much of a hurry, have always struck me as woefully disorganized. In fact, after I got over my rather nasty little bout of schadenfreude, I was a little sad at seeing this home-town example of hurry sickness. In order to look busy and important, my old classmate had sacrificed common sense and ordinary dignity. You certainly know that this little comedy used to be called "keeping up with the Joneses," then "the rat race," and neither term is particularly complimentary. But that just doesn't seem to be a deterrent.

Perhaps these folks are driven by fear, like OldGuy's greedy birds, who never know if they'll have another chance to score big and make foolish decisions because of that.

All I know is that I make time to mosey, and to meander, too. I did enough silly headless wing-flapping as a younger woman, and I'll be damned if I'll make a fool of myself like that again. I'll hurry if I have to, if it's necessary, if it's an emergency. Otherwise, I prefer to plan ahead. I like to think I look a little smarter that way -- a little more grown-up. It's sure easier on the nerves.

Last Edited on 16-May-2008 2:37 PM

TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2724 post s
19-May-2008
7:45 AM
Hey, Rhubarb -- It's good to hear from you. You haven't posted in quite a while.

You hit the nail on the head when you suggest that super-busy people are probably disorganized. When I worked in an office, I noticed that the people who were most frequently doing headless chicken impersonations were also the least likely to meet deadlines and the most likely to produce do-overs. As someone who was at the end of the process in a quality-control role, I was in a position to spot this. Their bosses were often fooled because these people always appeared to be working extra hard, but if these hyperactive individuals had hit the pause button more often and had "multitasked" less, they could have been more efficient.

I also think that the appearance of "busyness" is a ploy that some people use to exude an aura of self-importance. Nowhere is this more evident than in how people use their cell phones. They think it's a public advertisement that people want to talk to and listen to them. If you've ever eavesdropped on a cell phone conversation, as I have done occasionally, the one fact that is obvious is how many of these conversations are trivial. The old axiom about engaging the brain before moving the mouth no longer seems to apply.
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)

Last Edited on 19-May-2008 7:46 AM

CeeBee

1752 post s
19-May-2008
9:14 AM
Around Chicagoland, the "busy" person with cell phone always stuck to his ear is often the driver of a monster truck with big wheels or a Hummer or a pricey SUV.
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2726 post s
20-May-2008
2:30 PM
Here in New Jersey, I think that the "busy" people who are most likely to be using cell phones while driving are soccer moms in SUVs. This practice continues even though NJ passed legislation this year making use of a hands-on phone while driving a primary offense. Prior to the new law, cops had to have another reason for stopping the driver. I think the cops are too busy to bother.

I wish the authorities would legalize phone zappers. I'd make a crusade out of zapping cell phones wherever I went.
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)

OldGuy

63 post s
21-May-2008
8:01 PM
Sounds like fun, Mudge! I've always wished I could have a device in my pocket, for those who stand behind me or in a meeting blabbing on a cell phone, that would transmit an ear-splitting noise to their toy -- something like the little tin whistle my aunt used in the old days to clear the party line. When those hurried soccer moms in their SUVs make one-handed left turns toward me, it's scary.

(I think the best example of unimportant use of a cell phone I have witnessed was a 50-year-old man informing his mother he was standing in line in the restroom.)

And hooray for you, Rhubarb! Saunter on!

TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2735 post s
22-May-2008
10:35 PM
Old Guy: I understand there actually is a device that can be used to jam nearby cell phones. I don't know exactly what it does, but I read a column in a tech magazine last year by a man who said that was all he wanted for Christmas, even though (he said) they're illegal.

The ear-splitting whistle is a great idea, too. Or how's this – a device that allows you to transmit a message to the user's phone? It might just keep saying, "Hello, Hello." Or perhaps: "You are making a public nuisance of yourself. Please hang up your phone."
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)

rhubarb

178 post s
23-May-2008
10:33 AM
I thought I'd amble on back to see how things were progressing on this thread. Thanks, OldGuy and Mudge, for your kind words.

I find I must wag a languid, mildly admonitory finger at the both of you, though. While it is great fun to cook up outrageous schemes for ridding oneself of the nuisance of incessant cell-phoning in one's vicinity, I must caution you that the ideas so far, such as obtaining an illegal device to block calls or using a whistle, ear-splitting, to further disrupt the auditory environment, seem not so much curmudgeonly as, frankly, adolescent. Tut-tut, etc.

I'm hoping the two of you -- and everyone else who might be interested, of course -- can help me resolve, legally and cleverly and politely, one of the two cell-phone etiquette violations I routinely encounter. The first, which I call I Am Not a Radio, has to do with the distressing tendency of friends and relatives to call me up at home for a chat during a long commute or while audibly engaging in other activities, such as running a sewing machine. I rather bluntly ask, when I suspect a tricky eye-to-hand operation is taking place during the conversation, whether my caller is busy, and usually get a confession of driving (traffic is always light) or sewing ("Oh, you heard that?"). I then politely suggest she call back when she's not busy, at which time I'd love to continue our chat, and hang up.

The second problem, for which I seek suggestions, has to do with a neighbor who apparently cannot drive or enter or exit her house without talking on her cell phone. We live in a Chicago-style bungalow on a narrow lot (CeeBee knows exactly what I'm talking about; these charming brick houses are arranged cheek-by-jowl), and our bedroom window faces the neighbor's driveway and front door. This woman, the neighbor, apparently runs a public house of some sort, and often returns to her house in the wee hours of the morning. I am often awakened by the buzz-saw tones of this petite flower, loudly declaiming in Anglo-Saxon monosyllables, complete with Northern Cities Vowel Shift, to some wakeful unfortunate about some thing or someone.

I am usually too rattled to do the obvious, which is stick my head out the window and bellow like a local for her to shut the hell up, people are tryin' to sleep in here, already. In the morning, I am glad of my reticence, but the next time it happens, I find myself unprepared, at 2 a.m., with a firm but polite way to convey my displeasure. Since this problem fails to wake my husband, and I am, after all, a woman of a certain age, I feel it incumbent upon me to handle the problem myself. I just can't come up with the right timing or words, though. For some reason, problems with neighbors tend to be stickier than problems with friends or relatives, who do not (thank god) live next door.

Any and all suggestions, including entertaining ones, will be entertained.

TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2736 post s
23-May-2008
2:48 PM
I have no suggestions about the first situation. I think that a polite request to cease and desists, such as you give, should do the trick.

As for the neighbor, I offer the solution for which Old Guy and I have been politely chastised. What you need is a phone zapper. Once the neighbor has been zapped often enough, she will desist. It beats bellowing out the window, which will only waken others.
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)

OldGuy

64 post s
23-May-2008
6:00 PM
“The ideas so far, such as obtaining an illegal device to block calls or using a whistle, ear-splitting, to further disrupt the auditory environment, seem not so much curmudgeonly as, frankly, adolescent.”

But you have to admit, they surely would be fun!

I can't help you with your first problem. Being a known curmudgeon, I don't get trivial calls, so I am not experienced in handling them, at least not tactfully.

In the second case, I can imagine what you are going through, having the memory of living (for a short time) many years ago next to a neighbor who began making shipping pallets in his garage on third shift. I intend to die here where I am now with seldom more than owls, coyotes, and a distant train to make noise at night. In the same situation, I’m afraid that I would simply have to use the tactic you have already considered, telling this inconsiderate person, in a carefully pre-planned choice of delivery, to shut the hell up. It works. I’ve done it. What kind of a friendship would you be risking? It sounds like she is already making it clear that your welfare is of no concern to her because you are not a friend of hers. But if she does care and it’s just a case of thoughtlessness, things should work out fine. It’s not a time to mosey, meander, or saunter. This is some of the madness of frantic lives that caused this thread.

Last Edited on 23-May-2008 6:18 PM

TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2741 post s
24-May-2008
10:10 AM
Bravo, Old Guy! Yes, the most effective solution is to tell her to "shut the hell up." If this is done in more polite terms than that, that should do it. If you need to explain why her behavior is annoying or if she doesn't care, why bother to try to stay on good neighborly terms with her?

If people's behavior is harmful only to them, that's their business. When it negatively affects us, we should let them know about it. Perhaps all they need is a gentle reminder. If they are just inconsiderate by nature, we have no recourse but to make them pay for it, preferably in a way that will entertain or amuse us. That's where a phone zapper comes in.

One doesn't have to be a curmudgeon to complain when people behave badly. I think we go too far these days in tolerating inappropriate behavior – undisciplined kids in restaurants, for example. We put great emphasis on individual rights (as indeed we should), but we fail to draw the line when people exercise their "rights" to the detriment of others. We shouldn't knock the little phartlings unconscious when they misbehave in restaurants, but we can and should protest to their parents. Rhubarb shouldn't smash the noisy neighbor's phone to bits, but she can and should tell her to quit the noisy conversations in the driveway during the wee hours.
----------
Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)

CeeBee

1761 post s
24-May-2008
10:51 AM
Grab a cup of freshly-made coffee and a few caramel brownies, then gather around me whilst I tell you stories about patron behavior in public libraries.
OldGuy

66 post s
25-May-2008
4:11 PM
Having begun my use of the local Carnegie library when it was so quiet that I can still remember hearing the librarian's steel ink pen scratching on the log book, I would suggest that has the makings of a great new thread, CeeBee!
rhubarb

179 post s
26-May-2008
7:04 AM
OldGuy, Mudge, thanks for the encouragement. I've resolved to politely confront my neighbor the morning after the very next incident, so the event is fresh in both our minds.