|
|
|
General Message Board>
Grumbling Ideas
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2585 post s
27-Feb-2008
7:57 PM
|
My magnum opus (tentative title: The Joy of Grumbling), which may or may not become a reality, is currently in bits and pieces – what I call the brainstorming stage. As I've been writing, I've had no difficulty coming up with general ideas, but I've often been stumped on the specific details, which is a bit surprising since I am a confirmed grumbler. Of course, to make the ideas entertaining (and to avoid a pedantic tone), I need specific, illustrative grumbles (preferably humorous, topical, or both). Any ideas? To help you along, here are some of the points that have already emerged: > Grumblers are not appreciated and are always put down by the Pollyannas of the world, who view them as defeatists and pessimists. > Grumbling is constructive; if it weren't for grumblers, hardly anything would be improved because we would all be (or pretend to be) perfectly content with the way things are. > Grumbling is a kind of therapy. > A primary, possibly the primary, source of grumbling is other people's stupidity. (I intend to have at least a chapter on "Stupid People.") > Grumbling is most effective when tempered by humor, albeit often sarcastic or sardonic humor. > To be effective, grumblers need to be literate; illiterate grumbling suggests lack of intelligence and therefore is rarely taken seriously. > Debunking nonsense is one of the goals of grumbling, for it seeks to reduce foolish notions to appropriate absurdity. All of this raises some specific questions: > How does one deal with those exasperatingly cheerful Pollyannas who seem to feel that we're sick if we aren't happy all the time? > What are some of the constructive results of grumbling? > If you're a grumbler, how does it serve you as a therapeutic tool? > What specific evidence (outside the Darwin Awards) do we have that human stupidity knows no boundaries? > How does one temper serious grumbling with humor? > Is it important for grumblers to be literate as well? > What are some kinds of nonsense that really need to be debunked? If you don't respond, I'll sit here grumbling about your apathy. ---------- Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)
|
Pogo
256 post s
28-Feb-2008
8:33 AM
|
Constructive results? I've seen fewer typos in books since I wrote to publishers about the typos I'd seen in their own books. Stores have sometimes added what I want to their inventory. Once in a great while, manufacturers have changed their product. Literate? Letters to manufacturers work better than any other method. That actual piece of paper has a physical presence and often gets passed up the chain, especially if it's addressed to the big cheese.
|
Sapninman
361 post s
28-Feb-2008
10:11 AM
|
Maybe Pollyannas need to be reminded that, overall, pessimists aren't necessarily unhappy. Compared with optimists, how often are pessimists disappointed? An optimist and a pessimist were having a chat. Said the overbearingly cheerful optimist, "This is the best of all possible worlds!" Replied the pessimist, "I'm afraid you're right."
|
OldGuy
56 post s
28-Feb-2008
6:00 PM
|
In the management world I inhabited I found that pessimism and realism were largely synonymous. As a middle manager, I learned that skepticism, which is expressed as grumbling, is an important tool or asset for responsible management. It keeps one on the road to success in spite of the help, guidance, and leadership one gets from top management, expensive consultants, government agencies, and the like - keeps one from going over the brink with the lemmings. It steels one for all the things that can and do go bad, eliminating bad surprises. Had there been a ninth beatitude, it may have read something like, "Blessed are they who expect little, for they shall not be disappointed." As well as a therapeutic tool, grumbling is a very physical tool, or weapon, for making one's way through and fending off stupidity. It's something like Jesse Holmes' big club. Like any tool or weapon, it is never used indiscriminately by the responsible grumbler. There must always be a good and necessary purpose, and great care must be taken to assure that no innocent onlookers are hurt. The wielder of grumbling must have the strength of knowledge of the facts. Sarcastic humor keeps his grumbling sharp and in top form, enhancing his notoriety. The truly proficient grumbler will have honed his skill until he is as respected as John Wayne by stupid and wise alike. Literacy means magnum grumbling. It can bring about fear or respect in some of the most militant stupid. Constructive results of grumbling? Call it bragging if you will, but in the end, very observable and measurable increasingly high productivity, profitability, and attraction and retention of excellent employees in my area resulted from being "pessimistic" and "resistant to change". In the meantime, a long succession of CEOs, expensive consultants, and other smiling proponents of optimistic and stupid beliefs and plans bit the dust.
Last Edited on 28-Feb-2008 9:19 PM
|
CeeBee
1570 post s
1-Mar-2008
10:20 PM
|
Mudge, a pedantic tone is exactly what is needed to make your thoughts and ideas entertaining! You are a grumbler, are you not? (Think Andy Rooney, not Andy Hardy.)
Last Edited on 1-Mar-2008 10:21 PM
|
coley
210 post s
5-Mar-2008
7:27 AM
|
I think CeeBee is right about Andy Rooney being a good example. The only problem with Andy Rooney is that he was primarily on television. He was able to temper his grumbling by his pleasant tone. You could always tell from the tone in his voice that he was enjoying the delicious irony of the situation. I think you can convey that in print, but you must never feel anger when you are writing. You have to see it as humorous in order to express it that way. Coley
|
TheMudge
The Real Mudge
2590 post s
5-Mar-2008
3:59 PM
|
Thank you, Coley. The point is well-taken but not really necessary. No doubt, I shall be using examples of things that make me angry, but I won't be writing at times when the fuse is still burning. I've lived long enough to know that 99% of yesterday's sources of justified grumbling are, in retrospect, unimportant and sometimes funny today. Thanks also to the rest of you. I appreciate the comments and will be looking for more. Don't be surprised if you find yourself referenced or quoted (anonymously, of course). Old Guy: Your remarks inspire me to include a chapter on "Workplace Grumbling," in which I shall argue that grumblers can be leaders and inovators in business, as long as they are not merely chronic malcontents. ---------- Rich Turner (The Curmudgeon Himself)
|
|
|